About the Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy (MCEA)

Since 1974, the Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy has been protecting our water, air, land and people.

MCEA works with government agencies, the Legislature, and the courts to set sound environmental policy, to ensure good laws are enacted, and to enforce the law when needed. We are committed to working across all sectors – private and public, profit and nonprofit, political and academic – to form the partnerships needed to succeed. Real environmental issues are complex and real environmental progress takes time. MCEA is in it for the long haul.

Top Non-Profit

Philanthropedia recently named MCEA one of the most effective and highest-impact environmental non-profit organizations in Minnesota!

Experts were interviewed about many different aspects and activities of environmental non-profits and ranked the top 18 here. MCEA is thrilled and honored to be so high on the list! To learn more, read MCEA's Philanthropedia profile here.

Follow us on Twitter!

Scott's Blog

February 2: Turning swords into shields David Shaffer has an article in today's Star Tribune addressing the EPA's proposal to exempt facilities like XCel Energy's giant Sherco coal plant from stricter air quality requirements because they are in the region covered by the new Cross-State Air Pollution rule (CSAPR).  Under the EPA's proposal, XCel can purchase or cash in credits in a cap-and-trade system and avoid having to invest in better air quality control technology at Sherco.  (Big Stone 1 in South Dakota, on the other hand,  has to spend nearly half a billion dollars to bring the plant up to "best available retrofit technology" (BART) standards, because they are not in the region the Cross-State rule covers.)

This is the issue covered in the new report prepared by the National Parks Conservation Association, MCEA, and other groups on how the EPA's proposal will exacerbate the "regional haze" problem we are seeing in protected areas like the Boundary Waters Canoe Area and Voyageurs National Park. The bottom line is that we need to have both market-based incentives to move toward cleaner energy, and strict regulation, if we hope to achieve our goals. Frankly, I'm not sure this policy is doing XCel any favors.  If they do soon what I think they know needs to be done, and what regulators will eventually require--moving Sherco away from coal or putting in hundreds of millions of dollars of air pollution control technology--their shareholders and ratepayers may squawk because there appears to be a cheaper way out now.  This proposed exemption creates an incentive for utilities to think more in the short term than in the long term, and that is truly unfortunate.

February 1: More on ag water pollution "certainty" program From MCEA board member Don Shelby.

January 31: Why farmers should care about Lake PepinNice op-ed from Michael McKay in today's Star Tribune, executive director of the Lake Pepin Legacy Alliance, on agriculture-related water pollution in Minnesota--where it comes from, what it does to the river and the Gulf, how it can be fixed.  Doesn't shy away from the size of the problem, but remains optimistic.

January 31: Check out this editorial on Ellen Anderson rejection
See more...

Recent News

February 2: MPCA files report on permitting efficiency House File 1, passed in 2011, required MPCA to set a goal of issuing permits within 150 days. MPCA received over 2500 permit applications in the nine-month period between March 4, 2011 (when House File 1 took effect) and December 31. In that time, the agency processed 99% of priority permits within 150 days. These priority permits required construction or significant modification of the facility in question – the types of action that can create jobs. The facilities receiving these 1,632 permits will help grow Minnesota’s economy without delay by MPCA.

Among all permit applications, including the more routine renewals, the agency took longer than 150 days with only 10% of permit applications. For most permits that took longer, there was a good reason: the agency was waiting for info from permittees, there was a significant public engagement process, federal or state policies changed, or the government was shut down. Read the permitting efficiency report here.

January 31: National parks, wilderness areas and wildlife refuges, like the Boundary Waters and Voyageurs National Park, are beloved places. Their protection and restoration is supposed to be a national priority. But EPA’s new proposal to exempt outdated coal plants from installing the haze-reducing controls leave many of these places, including here in Minnesota, with less protection from pollutants than they ought to have. This is not acceptable. The report, Cleaning up the Haze: Protecting People and American Treasured Places, points out how loopholes in this policy could leave these special places without adequate air quality protection.  The report calls on EPA to abandon its proposal and to ensure cleaner air. Read the press release here. January 23: Conservation Minnesota released its annual report reviewing the state's environment and conservation budget. The report found that the legislature disproportionately cut funding compared to other areas of the budget, and in some cases the legislature appears to be substituting Legacy Amendment funding for general funding. The legislature missed opportunities to provide ongoing support for existing programs in the general fund budget, but has managed to provide consistent levels of bonding to environment and conservation projects.

January 18: MCEA’s on-going efforts to engage, educate and inform the communities about forthcoming light rail transit projects is expanding in a new direction: linguistically. Learn more here!

See more...

Tweet Us!

Follow us on Twitter (@MCEA1974) for important updates as they happen! Tweet at us with questions, ideas, or other environmental news.

  Search
Copyright (c) 2012 MCEA website
Register  |