Gulf of Mexico

The Dead Zone

The Gulf of Mexico is plagued by high levels of nutrients each year. These nutrients trigger large blooms of algae, peaking in the summer. When the algae blooms die, they fall to the bottom and bacteria decompose the algae. This decomposition process consumes most or all of the oxygen in a significant area near the shoreline. Without oxygen, all aquatic life in the area flees or dies. The result is a large area with little or no aquatic life. Watch this video to learn more:

 

 

(Courtesy of NASA Mississippi Dead Zone)

The size of the dead zone has trended upward over the last several decades, as shown on the chart below. The increasing levels of nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus) have triggered larger algae blooms, leading to larger areas of depleted oxygen. The biggest dead zone in 2002 was approximately the size of New Jersey.

 

(Courtesy of LUMCON)

The solution to the problem is reducing the nutrient inputs that start the cycle leading to low oxygen. EPA issued an “Urgent Call to Action” report in 2008 for reduced nutrient levels. Unfortunately, from 1980 to 2008, nitrogen levels did not significantly decline.  In the area upstream from Clinton, Iowa (including much of Minnesota and parts of Wisconsin), nitrogen levels actually increased by 76 percent. Only with major nutrient reductions from upstream states will the Gulf of Mexico be able to maintain aquatic life.

In July of 2008, MCEA, along with conservation groups from eight other states and two national groups, petitioned the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to set and enforce numeric standards to limit nitrogen and phosphorus pollution in the Gulf of Mexico and Mississippi River basin, and to clean up those water bodies. Three years later, EPA denied the petition, citing lack of resources.

Denial of the Mississippi River Collaborative Petition

 

Recent Updates: EPA Lawsuits

NRDC filed two lawsuits in March 2012 against U.S. EPA on behalf of MCEA and other partners of the Mississippi River Collaborative. The first suit challenges EPA’s denial of the MCEA-led 2008 petition to develop water quality standards for nutrients causing the enormous Dead Zone in the Gulf of Mexico. EPA has repeated for years that nutrient standards are needed to protect the nation’s waters, but has neither enforced its deadlines for states to develop them nor adopted federal limits. Most states are no closer to nutrient standards than when the Clean Water Act passed in 1972.

Nutrient Standard Lawsuit Documents:
 
The second suit demands that EPA respond to a petition submitted in 2007 to update the wastewater standards for sewage treatment plants from 1985. The existing standards do not require treatment for nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus) despite widely available and inexpensive technology. The largest point source of nutrients to the dead zone is Chicago’s wastewater treatment facility.
 
Wastewater Treatment of Nutrients (Secondary Treatment Standards):
 
Read more:

Environmental groups sue US EPA over Gulf dead zone (Chicago Tribune)

Lawsuits against EPA target nutrients in US waters (Associated Press)

Environmental groups sue EPA over Gulf dead zone (Reuters)

Lawsuits against EPA target chemical nutrient pollution that feeds algae blooms in US waters (Washington Post)

Gulf Ecosystem Restoration Task Force Releases Final Strategy

The Gulf Ecosystem Restoration Task Force, created by executive order, brought together states, federal agencies, local governments, and citizen organizations to plan a recovery for the Gulf of Mexico. Though its creation was spurred by the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010, the plan also seeks to remedy the gulf’s Dead Zone.

One of the new proposals in the plan is the creation of the Gulf of Mexico Initiative, which will dedicate $50 million for improved agricultural practices on the gulf coast. This new program, much like the Mississippi River Basin Initiative, will target priority watersheds bordering the gulf to improve water quality. The initiative uses existing USDA funding programs, but provides the targeted funding to ensure progress will be made.

While the strategy is an overarching plan to improve the gulf, it still relies on actions by upstream states that cause the problem. The report recommends allocating loads to upstream watersheds, establishing accountability measures, and developing more effective methods for nonpoint source pollution reductions. Unfortunately, the report does not detail how to implement those recommendations. Instead, existing federal programs and state actions will need to reduce the phosphorus and nitrogen that cause the dead zone. Those programs have not been successful to date. Eliminating the dead zone is still the responsibility of the upstream states that are causing the problem, not just the states in the gulf.

Read more:

Full Strategy Report (PDF)

Gulf Task Force website

USDA Gulf of Mexico Initiative

USDA Mississippi River Basin Initiative

Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy
26 E. Exchange Street, Suite 206
St. Paul, MN 55101 | (651) 223-5969            
           

  Search
Copyright (c) 2012 MCEA website
Register  |